<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Album annual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/</link>
	<description>a blog by Jim Bliss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 02:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrick</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>merrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://panadoladiction.com/2008/07/08/58/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Panadola Diction&#039;s list&lt;/a&gt;. Another Dubliner, picking (as I would) Faith and Achtung Baby. And unlike you he doesn&#039;t commit the heresy of leaving out Doolittle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://panadoladiction.com/2008/07/08/58/" rel="nofollow">Panadola Diction&#8217;s list</a>. Another Dubliner, picking (as I would) Faith and Achtung Baby. And unlike you he doesn&#8217;t commit the heresy of leaving out Doolittle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When how you want &#171; The gaping silence</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>When how you want &#171; The gaping silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>[...]  I guess anyone born much before the mid-50s is going to have trouble with the early years, says Jim. You don&#8217;t know the half of it. I was born in 1960, and I&#8217;ve really struggled with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I guess anyone born much before the mid-50s is going to have trouble with the early years, says Jim. You don&#8217;t know the half of it. I was born in 1960, and I&#8217;ve really struggled with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrick</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>merrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>On the Bowie news front, did you see the track listing he did for a compilation that came with (ahem) the Mail On Sunday a couple of weeks back?

   1. Life On Mars
   2. Sweet Thing/Candidate/Sweet Thing (Reprise)
   3. The Bewlay Brothers
   4. Lady Grinning Soul
   5. Win
   6. Some Are (Low out-take)
   7. Teenage Wildlife
   8. Repetition
   9. Fantastic Voyage
  10. Loving the Alien
  11. Time Will Crawl (MM Re-mix)
  12. Hang on to Yourself (Live from the Santa Monica &#039;72)

corking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Bowie news front, did you see the track listing he did for a compilation that came with (ahem) the Mail On Sunday a couple of weeks back?</p>
<p>   1. Life On Mars<br />
   2. Sweet Thing/Candidate/Sweet Thing (Reprise)<br />
   3. The Bewlay Brothers<br />
   4. Lady Grinning Soul<br />
   5. Win<br />
   6. Some Are (Low out-take)<br />
   7. Teenage Wildlife<br />
   8. Repetition<br />
   9. Fantastic Voyage<br />
  10. Loving the Alien<br />
  11. Time Will Crawl (MM Re-mix)<br />
  12. Hang on to Yourself (Live from the Santa Monica &#8217;72)</p>
<p>corking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrick</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>merrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I realse there&#039;s a chance I may burn in hell for choosing Achtung Baby ahead of, say... ... ... Loveless.&lt;/i&gt;

Or Nevermind, pal.

1977 was indeed something of a Bowie year. But Never Mind The Bollocks, Saturday Night Fever and flippin Exodus! All of which tower over even the might of New Boots and Panties.

It appears to be one of those years like 67 that you just couldn&#039;t have kept up with new releases (Sgt Pepper, plus 2 albums from Hendrix, 2 from the Doors, 2 from Bolan, 2 from the Stones, 2 from Love, plus Magical Mystery Tour EP, Let&#039;s Spend The Night Together, Strawberry Fields. And Laughing Gnome).

Not sure I&#039;ll have a go at this one, Jim. I&#039;ve bought less and less new music in the last ten years, I&#039;d not have much problem with an overwhelm of candidates since about 1996; if anything I might struggle to find summat for some years of the last decade.

Not that I&#039;m being one of those nostalgia tossers who thinks all modern music is crap compared to when they were young. If anything, I&#039;d guess it&#039;s the opposite; it&#039;s got easier and cheaper to make music, so in all likelihood there&#039;s more great music being made now than ever before.

But I no longer find myself frequently spending hours on end sitting listening to music as a sole activity in itself. More of an issue is the fact that most of what I do get is old stuff. Way the majority of music I&#039;ve discovered in the last couple of years is older than I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I realse there&#8217;s a chance I may burn in hell for choosing Achtung Baby ahead of, say&#8230; &#8230; &#8230; Loveless.</i></p>
<p>Or Nevermind, pal.</p>
<p>1977 was indeed something of a Bowie year. But Never Mind The Bollocks, Saturday Night Fever and flippin Exodus! All of which tower over even the might of New Boots and Panties.</p>
<p>It appears to be one of those years like 67 that you just couldn&#8217;t have kept up with new releases (Sgt Pepper, plus 2 albums from Hendrix, 2 from the Doors, 2 from Bolan, 2 from the Stones, 2 from Love, plus Magical Mystery Tour EP, Let&#8217;s Spend The Night Together, Strawberry Fields. And Laughing Gnome).</p>
<p>Not sure I&#8217;ll have a go at this one, Jim. I&#8217;ve bought less and less new music in the last ten years, I&#8217;d not have much problem with an overwhelm of candidates since about 1996; if anything I might struggle to find summat for some years of the last decade.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m being one of those nostalgia tossers who thinks all modern music is crap compared to when they were young. If anything, I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s the opposite; it&#8217;s got easier and cheaper to make music, so in all likelihood there&#8217;s more great music being made now than ever before.</p>
<p>But I no longer find myself frequently spending hours on end sitting listening to music as a sole activity in itself. More of an issue is the fact that most of what I do get is old stuff. Way the majority of music I&#8217;ve discovered in the last couple of years is older than I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bliss</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>I use Media Player rather than iTunes, Phil, but the principle is the same. I basically just &quot;sorted by year&quot;, no trawling through album sleeves to confirm whether &#039;Goodbye Jumbo&#039; was 1989 or 1990.

You&#039;re right when you point out that &lt;i&gt;Station to Station&lt;/i&gt; was released in 1976. It was one of the few decent records of that year. But it was hardly a classic. At least, not by Bowie&#039;s standards, and certainly not in the same league as Bob Marley&#039;s 1976 masterpiece (&lt;i&gt;Rastaman Vibration&lt;/i&gt; is easily my favourite of his albums). I&#039;ve always seen Bowie&#039;s post-glam / pre-Berlin period as being the calm before the storm. As though he was, as an artist, pausing briefly to gather himself before launching into Low, &quot;Heroes&quot; and Lodger; three albums in a two year period that would define most other artists and overshadow all else they produced, but which -- for Bowie -- merely became &quot;his late 70s stuff&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Media Player rather than iTunes, Phil, but the principle is the same. I basically just &#8220;sorted by year&#8221;, no trawling through album sleeves to confirm whether &#8216;Goodbye Jumbo&#8217; was 1989 or 1990.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right when you point out that <i>Station to Station</i> was released in 1976. It was one of the few decent records of that year. But it was hardly a classic. At least, not by Bowie&#8217;s standards, and certainly not in the same league as Bob Marley&#8217;s 1976 masterpiece (<i>Rastaman Vibration</i> is easily my favourite of his albums). I&#8217;ve always seen Bowie&#8217;s post-glam / pre-Berlin period as being the calm before the storm. As though he was, as an artist, pausing briefly to gather himself before launching into Low, &#8220;Heroes&#8221; and Lodger; three albums in a two year period that would define most other artists and overshadow all else they produced, but which &#8212; for Bowie &#8212; merely became &#8220;his late 70s stuff&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://numero57.net/2008/07/12/album-annual/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://numero57.net/?p=297#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d do this like a shot (although 1960-64 might be a bit tricky), but the thought of rooting through all those albums and searching the sleeves for the (c) and (p) dates is a bit offputting. (You&#039;ve got it all on iTunes, right?)

Just looking at the bits of my collection that have made it into iTunes... dear Lord, I&#039;d have to choose between &lt;i&gt;Pet Sounds&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Revolver&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;and &lt;i&gt;Blonde on Blonde&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. And then between &lt;i&gt;Pepper&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Forever changes&lt;/i&gt;. Then &lt;i&gt;Family entertainment&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Basket of light&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Volume two&lt;/i&gt;...

&quot;nobody else releasing much of anything&quot; in 1976? You mean, &lt;b&gt;apart from&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Station to station&lt;/i&gt;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d do this like a shot (although 1960-64 might be a bit tricky), but the thought of rooting through all those albums and searching the sleeves for the (c) and (p) dates is a bit offputting. (You&#8217;ve got it all on iTunes, right?)</p>
<p>Just looking at the bits of my collection that have made it into iTunes&#8230; dear Lord, I&#8217;d have to choose between <i>Pet Sounds</i>, <i>Revolver</i> <b>and <i>Blonde on Blonde</i></b>. And then between <i>Pepper</i> and <i>Forever changes</i>. Then <i>Family entertainment</i>, <i>Basket of light</i> and <i>Volume two</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;nobody else releasing much of anything&#8221; in 1976? You mean, <b>apart from</b> <i>Station to station</i>&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

