Some reviews
Hallo folks. Well, I’m finally back from my extended Easter break. A long-weekend got transformed into a ten day holiday thanks to West Cork’s unusually-Mediterranean weather. Technically I was cycling (on my new and excellent bike). But I feel a bit of a cheat making that claim as the time mostly consisted of sitting on cliff-tops or beaches and eating the occasional biscuit. In amidst all the lazing about in the sun though, I helped someone clean a patio (don’t ask). Right at the end, after all the heavy lifting, bending and scrubbing was done, I decided to give the stones one last leisurely sweep. It was just then that some hitherto uncomplaining muscle in my lower back decided to go “ping” (or whatever sound muscles make when they tear).
At the time it was fairly painful, but bearable. The next day though was spent sitting in a car on my way back to Dublin. A journey that gave my back plenty of time to seize up good and proper. It’s starting to sort itself out now, and movement without unreasonable agony is possible again. But lying motionless for over a week has given me plenty of time to reflect on the fact that I can spend a week cycling and clambering over rocks and climbing the occasional tree and it be nothing but physically pleasurable… but a few hours of repetitive labour will bugger up my back.
This should surprise nobody except the creationists.
Of course, lazing around on the couch blitzed on painkillers and muscle-relaxants is hardly the worst fate that can befall a person (though it annoys me that I was forced to resort to such medication… the dearth of quality sensimilia in this country is shameful). Especially a person with an extensive DVD collection. So, some quickie reviews…
Stalker. It’s possible that this late-70s Russian art-SF film would be utterly incomprehensible even without taking a bunch of strong painkillers. Right now though, I can’t say for sure. Hypnotic, dreamlike and very odd. I recommend it.
Six Feet Under (Season 1). Television is almost never this good. The writing is wonderful, the acting is flawless and the production values make most Hollywood films seem pale and one-dimensional. I must admit to being vaguely annoyed by the very final scene of the season, but aside from that I can’t think of a single thing wrong with this programme. An unflinching and visionary look at human relationships and emotion. A work of genius.
Stranger Than Fiction. I have very little time for Will Ferrell (his part in Zoolander was bearable only because the rest of the film was so funny) but given the hype surrounding this film (I can’t help but be interested when the name Charlie Kaufman is mentioned, even if only by comparison) I figured it was worth a shot. And it turns out that — just like Jim Carrey — Will Ferrell is capable of doing a half-decent job when cast against type… in this case as a dull, repressed, buttoned-down office worker. Definitely worth a look.
Casino Royale. A bearable action flick. The chase scene at the beginning is by far the best part. When it shows up on TV it’s worth tuning in to the first ten minutes or so. Sadly it’s all downhill after that. Even the much-discussed torture scene is sanitised, so that it forces you to wince rather than turn away from the screen (as in Reservoir Dogs or Syriana). If someone’s getting tortured on-screen and you’re only wincing, then the director hasn’t done their job very well.
The Ice Harvest. John Cusack is a very watchable actor. And he’s been in some excellent films. Unfortunately his ratio of good films to utter dross isn’t as good as it once was, and he’s getting close to being an indication that I don’t want to see a film rather than a reason to see it. This is a particularly silly thriller that telegraphs every single plot twist and has a dire cop-out ending. Avoid.
I also rewatched Takeshi Kitano’s Dolls (possibly my favourite film ever) which gets more beautiful and moving with every viewing. Kitano had a degree of international success with Zatoichi which — it seems — irritated him somewhat. In response he made what is apparently one of the weirdest and most impenetrable films of recent years… Takeshis’. I can’t wait to see it!
Books
Lately my reading has become rather more focussed than is traditional for me. Regimented even. On my shelf since Christmas sits Pynchon’s massive and enticing Against The Day. It is, as yet, unopened. Well, that’s not strictly true… I couldn’t resist reading the first couple of pages… it starts well, introduced by a Thelonious Monk quote — “It’s always night, or we wouldn’t need light” — and opening aboard the hydrogen airship, Inconvenience. But I decided back at Christmas that I’d wait until summer to read it. For two reasons. One of them being that the best place and time to read great fiction is under some trees on a warm sunny day.
A bit less fluffy, the other reason is simply that although I’m looking forward to full-time study, it’s meant I’ve had to spend a wee while “revising”. See, before I made an abrupt about-turn and got sucked into engineering, my original degree — quite a while ago — was in philosophy. It included courses on ‘The Philosophy of Psychoanalysis’, ‘Theories of Rationality’ and the heavily-psychoanalytical ‘Philosophy and Gender’. Nonetheless, it was still primarily a philosophy course and in no way did it provide a formal grounding in psychoanalysis. And because psychoanalysis is a complex subject (in the sense that there are a multitude of competing theories) it can take a while to acquire a fairly thorough overview. There’s no single book I’ve found that does even a quarter-decent job, so it’s a case of reading several different collections, often with a phrase like “The Essential” in the title (as, for instance, in Princeton’s excellent The Essential Jung) and keeping those most invaluable tools by your side… The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology and The Penguin Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. The bevelled edges are pretty cool too.
I’m also starting to get the impression that Lacan is just Sartre with Venn Diagrams. But I imagine you get into trouble with the psychoanalytic community for saying things like that.
Anyways, I’m recovered enough to sit at the PC for more than five minutes without fretting that my back is going to seize up again. There was a worrying few days when I convinced myself that I’d slipped a disc, which I’m told can sometimes require surgery. Thankfully that wasn’t the case and I managed to cycle to the village and back today without any ill effect. So once I’ve caught up on my email, I’ll hopefully be blogging on a semi-regular basis again.
If the “Stalker” thing includes references to a place/state of mind called “The Zone” you might enjoy reading a book called “Yoga for people who can’t be bothered doing it” by Geoff Dyer.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Yoga-People-Who-Cant-Bothered/dp/0349116237
April 25th, 2007 | 9:21pm
by PMM
I saw Stalker at the press screening when it first came out, would you believe. Love it. You may be interested to read the novel it was based on, Roadside Picnic by the Strugatsky brothers. It’s not the greatest read, but it does make certain aspects clearer, including what ‘The Zone’ is. The film is far superior, mind, for not spelling much out.
April 26th, 2007 | 12:28am
by Joel
I gave a Buffy-sceptic friend my full explanatory rant a couple of years ago. He responded by pressing the box set of Six Feet Under season 1 into my hands, saying that he would never of imagined television could do what it does.
It has, quite literally, sat and gathered dust til the other week. It’s absolutely stunning stuff. So much drama is about posh people, violence, or both. It’s easy and its manipulative.
Six Feet Under has those things but only in relation to a more recognisable life. People talk in the way that people actually talk in real life. Which is making it sound kind of dull. An episode where one of the main events is a middle aged middle class woman getting a part time job in a florists does sound limp.
But the way it looks into the heart, the way it makes us feel the internal life of all different kinds of people with real sympathy, it’s a job I’ve never seen done on tv. The only thing I can compare it to are Jon McGregor’s astonishing novels.
It’s so well written, shot and acted that it doesn’t need to used extremity or metaphor to make its point. I have, I think, beyond the odds, found something on TV better than Buffy.
April 26th, 2007 | 7:00pm
by merrick
I don’t know if it’s quite on-topic but the psychotherapist I currently see (well, his case-officer really) recommended a tome called “Introduction to Psychotherapy: an outline of psychodynamic principles and practice” by Anthony Bateman, Dennis Brown and Jonathan Pedder (third ed, Routledge, 20000, ISBN 0 415 20569 7)
I asked what it might be useful to read to get an overview of the sort of thing that I was in for and this seems to be the standard text.
I’m not sure it’s been much help so far as I haven’t been able to get through the first few chapters yet, but that may just be my fault.
April 30th, 2007 | 4:45pm
by david
Thanks for the recommendation, David. I’ll be in Waterstones on Dawson Street this week. It’s next to Trinity College, and unsurprisingly has a fantastic psychology section. It’s possible that I have books that cover the same ground already, but I’ll have a flick through it just in case.
Joel, I downloaded Roadside Picnic but I’m not sure I want to read it. I really like the ambiguity of the film and it’s possible that reading a more structured account of what’s going on could actually detract from the experience. Perhaps after I’ve watched the film again…
… and yes, PMM, it is indeed about The Zone. The phrase “a place / state of mind” is a great way of describing it.
I don’t think, Merrick, that you can compare Buffy and Six Feet Under in the sense of one being “better” than another. They’re doing entirely different things. Buffy deals with the reality of human relationships by placing them in an entirely unreal setting. It’s all metaphor and witty one-liners. On the other hand Six Feet Under deals with those issues by stripping away all of the fantasy and shining a bright light on the real.
OK, OK, so it’s still heavily stylised and filled with potent symbolism but I hope you get the essence of what I’m saying?
Anyways, I’m halfway through Season 2 of Six Feet Under and it’s stunning stuff.
May 7th, 2007 | 12:47am
by Jim