The Host
A few nights ago I watched the Korean monster movie, The Host. Written and directed by Bong Joon-ho (what a fantastic name), it’s very possibly the finest film of the genre*. Actually, now that I think about it, Jaws may well stake a firmer claim for that title… but being the second-best monster movie to Jaws is hardly a disgrace.
And the Jaws comparison is an apt one. Like Spielberg’s classic, The Host is actually about how a small group of people deal with this catastrophic presence that enters their lives (in this case a broken family… two adult brothers and sister, their father, and the young daughter of one of the brothers), as opposed to being about the catastrophic presence itself. The acting is quite amazing and as the tragedy unfolds, engulfing this fragile family, I found myself being genuinely moved by their plight. I’m not sure even Jaws drew that level of emotional involvement from me.
One major difference, however, between the two is the lack of a “Big Reveal”. There’s no “We’re gonna need a bigger boat” scene halfway through the film. Instead we see the monster in its entirety bounding along the riverbank, gobbling up fleeing people, within the first five minutes. I was surprised by this, as I was with a lot of the film. Certainly the manner of the monster’s death is telegraphed early. Even before we see the thing, in fact, within the first few minutes of the film, the perceptive viewer will be left in no doubt as to a crucial factor in the beast’s eventual demise.
But aside from this, there’s little about The Host that most viewers will find predictable. Central characters who are guaranteed to survive the inevitable Hollywood remake, find themselves casually killed off with very little warning. And to say that the ultimate outcome would not feature in a big-budget American movie is an understatement. Nonetheless, the low-key, tragic ending fits perfectly on a film that is far, far more thoughtful than any monster movie has a right to be.
The dialogue is mostly in Korean, though the occasional American character makes an appearance and is presumably subtitled in Korean for the home audience. In fact, there’s a surprisingly strong anti-American theme throughout the film. The film opens with an American scientist ordering his Korean assistant to dump toxic chemicals into Seoul’s Han River (with obvious results). Later on we see a news report stating that the United States has lost confidence in Korea’s ability to contain the crisis and is planning to dump “Agent Yellow”, a powerful chemical, onto Seoul. As we follow the family’s attempt to track down their missing grand-daughter (snatched by the monster at the beginning of the film), it’s against the backdrop of a city bordering on open revolt against the authorities.
It’s worth pointing out that there is indeed one heroic American character. But even his sacrifice is cynically manipulated by the authorities in order to further their own inexplicable agenda.
In fact, it is this perspective that makes The Host such compelling viewing. For once, we aren’t seeing the monster hunt through the eyes of the military, or some heroic monster-expert. Instead we get a citizen’s view of the complete mess being made of the situation by the authorities, while an ordinary family attempt to overcome not merely the nightmarish creature from the river, but also the utter incompetence of those in power.
One scene in particular springs to mind; Gang-Du, the central character, has been placed in quarantine having been splattered with the monster’s blood. He desperately tries to convince the police that his daughter is still alive. But he’s not a very sharp guy and has difficulty expressing himself clearly. Throughout the scene, he is separated from those he’s trying to convince by a thick sheet of semi-transparent plastic. Later, as he pleads with one of the scientists, he again finds himself separated (this time by the contamination suits worn by the officials), and shouts in frustration; “Why won’t anyone listen to me? My words are words too!” Rarely have I seen social alienation portrayed so well. And this is in a monster movie!
Watching the film, I was reminded more than once of the Japanese auteur, Takeshi Kitano. And that’s not a lazy “well both directors are from somewhere over there” comparison. Kitano is my favourite film director, bar none, and there are scenes in The Host (such as the one where Gang-Du and his father are running alongside one another by the river, Nam-il’s encounter with the homeless guy, and the wonderful final battle) which I found very reminiscent of Kitano’s work.
That’s not to suggest that The Host is a work of towering genius like Dolls or Hana-bi, merely that it transcends a rather one-dimensional genre and succeeds in being a genuinely excellent movie. Overall, this is a film I’d recommend very highly indeed. On the most basic level, it’s a damn fine monster flick. But there’s far more to it than that. Check it out.
UPDATE 22:45 I’ve just noticed that the review-quote on the English version of the film poster is “On a par with Jaws”. Pretty good call.
I just stumbled upon this letter from the film’s director which I’ll publish here…
=============================
Dear Film Club Members:
I grew up near the banks of the Han River in Seoul. As a student, while daydreaming, I’d imagine what would happen if a fearsome creature made a sudden appearance from the depths of this river, so familiar and comfortable for us Seoulites. The riverbanks would be instantly plunged into chaos. I thought that this scene might one day make the basis for a great film. My film THE HOST begins at the precise moment in which a space familiar and intimate to us is suddenly transformed into the stage of an unthinkable disaster and tragedy.
THE HOST is a monster movie in the classic tradition of such films. But what is often overlooked when discussing this genre is how important it is to balance the appearance of a monster with lovable, empathetic characters. For this, I devised a very ‘typically’ Korean family who are by turns funny, inept, and heroic — like anyone’s family. Park Gang-du and his family have led ordinary, repetitive lives, never really extending beyond the confines of their small food stand on the banks of the Han River. They are devastated by the emergence of the Creature. Robbed of their peaceful daily routines, Gang-du and his family do the only thing they can: throw themselves into a life-and-death struggle against the Creature to rescue their lost daughter. The film shows how these exceedingly normal people, no different from our everyday neighbors, are transformed into monster-fighting warriors.
But as with all great monster films, the Creature is not the only adversary they have to fight. Have you ever felt powerless in the face of an immovable impasse? For Gang-du and his family, impoverished, powerless ‘little people’, the whole world around them is revealed to be a true monster. They have to fight against it tooth and nail. The film is, in the end, a record of their moving fight to the death against the indifferent, calculating and manipulative Monster known as the world. In that way, THE HOST is also a peek into contemporary Korea.
For a long time, I kept my desire to make my monster movie a secret. And even after revealing the idea, many told me that I shouldn’t make this film. But I felt that, just because monster movies haven’t been consistently great in a long time, that this wasn’t a reason to keep from making THE HOST. I hope you’ll go see it, and that you’ll think it was worthwhile as well.
Sincerely,
Bong Joon-ho
=============================
February 8th, 2008 | 10:56pm
by Jim Bliss
Oh, and here’s the trailer. Like most American trailers for foreign films, it actually gives the impression that the film’s dialogue is in English (rather than Korean with two minutes of English). Still, rent the DVD. Go on, you’ll enjoy it.
February 10th, 2008 | 3:09am
by Jim Bliss
just finished an extended break from the internet, so decided to pop over and visit for the first time in a while….. saw the Host last month and really enjoyed it (I’ve always been a big fan of the irradiated animal and insect genre), although I would still say Jaws is the better flick 🙂
February 12th, 2008 | 5:41am
by L
Welcome back, L, great to hear from you again. I hope Florida is still treating you well.
I agree that Jaws is a better movie, but the fact that The Host is even in the same league is quite impressive (given just how good Jaws actually is).
February 12th, 2008 | 1:53pm
by Jim Bliss
i take it you have seen ‘old boy’, another korean film?
it is quite good and also extremely far-fetched melodrama but having spent a year in south korea and without meaning to sound too harsh, i can assure you that a weird revenge fantasy does say something about national culture.
also, just adding a link to you now.
February 13th, 2008 | 1:00pm
by michael greenwell
Watched it. Loved it.
February 14th, 2008 | 9:33pm
by RA
I’d never heard of this film, but I was going to write something anyway… but then I went ahead and ordered it off Amazon, and it arrived today. So perhaps a more informed comment after the week-end… On the assumption I enjoy it, thanks for the tip.
I don’t get your distinction between “monster movies” and “horror films”, by the way – surely e.g American Werewolf is a classic example of both? But this is just pigeon-holing semantics, so let’s not worry.
February 15th, 2008 | 4:12pm
by Larry Teabag
It’s a pretty personal distinction, Larry. If a film actually scares me, then it’s a horror film (to me).
So if I’m out walking in the country and I notice there’s a full-moon, then An American Werewolf in London will always leap unbidden to my mind and before I know what’s happening I’m jumping at shadows and my heart is pounding. It’s very silly, but it always happens. On the other hand, Jaws never made me nervous about swimming in the sea. And I know I wouldn’t have any problems taking a walk along the Han River in Seoul after watching The Host.
Which is weird in one sense (after all, statistically speaking, I’m more likely to encounter a man-eating shark in the sea, than encounter a werewolf in the fields around Rathcoole), but in another sense is completely understandable… some films work their way into a dark corner of my imagination, while others don’t. And that’s a comment on my own imagination / unconscious mind, rather than the films.
Another example; I have occasional nightmares about the alien from Alien but vampire films (traditionally in the realm of horror) don’t scare me at all.
Michael, I’ve not seen Old Boy as it happens. There’s a genre of films (typified by Saw and sequels) that — in my view — rely almost exclusively on graphic depictations of sadism, torture and extreme suffering for their emotional impact. I don’t find these films scary (they’re not horror films by my above definition) but I do find them very grim viewing indeed, and not at all to my taste. I’d always assumed that Old Boy fell into this category and avoided it for that very reason.
Am I doing it an injustice?
February 15th, 2008 | 4:48pm
by Jim Bliss
Fair enough of course, but your personalised “horror genre” will look pretty different from what other / most people understand by the term.
Certainly you’re right about how these fears are totally irrational. Ringu, for instance still scares the bejesus out of me if I so much as think about it, but as a hardline rationalist atheist type I strongly disbelieve in ghosts, etc. Doesn’t help me sleep at night though…
[Thanks for correcting my typo by the way…]
February 15th, 2008 | 6:48pm
by Larry Teabag
… your personalised “horror genre” will look pretty different from what other / most people understand by the term.
Absolutely, Larry. And while I suppose that could get confusing if I was a film critic for a high-circulation publication (I’d probably have to modify my phrasing if I were), this blog is all about projecting my personal perception of things out into the world.
This is why, for instance, you won’t find me describing Bruce Almighty as a “comedy” on this blog.
[Thanks for correcting my typo by the way…]
No worries. I tend to correct typos in comments. Unless I disagree with the comment, of course. Then I leave the typos there as a way of subtracting credibility.
February 15th, 2008 | 6:57pm
by Jim Bliss
I watched it last night with some friends, only one of whom fell asleep during it… And I liked it very much, so thanks.
Certainly it’s not your typical monster movie, and rather less “monsterish” than I’m used too. I enjoyed the humanity of the whole story, the ordinariness of the characters, as you say.
(Slight disagreements with you – viewing the story through the eyes of “normal” people is quite common in the horror-genre, but what this film did exceptionally well was to make the “normal” people actually plausibly normal, rather than transforming them into superheros at some convenient some moment; also subtly hinting at the manner of the monster’s death early in the film is quite standard, though you’re right that this was easier to predict than most. I have in mind the lawnmower from Braindead as another example.)
I loved the low key political satire, building to something far more scathing at the end. It’s a funny film too – the scene where the family gather, weeping in front of Hyun-seo’s photograph, was bizarrely hilarious.
Mrs ‘B enjoyed it too, but was a bit more equivocal: she found the plot a bit static (I suppose an inevitable consequence of the authorities’ incompetence), and felt less moved, or involved with the characters, than you did.
I see what you mean about touches of Beat Takeshi… the slightly eccentric music giving it a quirky feel, the muted social comedy throughout, and, yes, the unknown quiet tramp who appears from nowhere and saves the day.
If I was going to make negative criticisms, it would be from the “horror” angle. I’d have liked a bit more explanation of what the monster was or where it came from than we got. If it was only going to be the guy pouring dirty formaldehyde down the sink at the beginning, that’s so inadequate that it’d be better just to say nothing at all (even if that would cost a slightly cheap anti-American shot). To my mind the scenes in the monster’s lair really should have been more horrible than they were. Or maybe that’s just me. The special effects were pretty good, and I liked the acrobatic way the monster moved, and how it looked when it lay down, or hung bat-like under the bridge, but its head and mouth was a bit… I don’t know… uninspiring. It’s difficult when so many variants on the big-monster-with-sharp-teeth theme have been done, but I’d like to have seen something I didn’t feel I’d seen before.
Anyway, it’s a valuable addition to my DVD collection, so cheers.
February 16th, 2008 | 4:30pm
by Larry Teabag
I’m glad you enjoyed it, Larry. There’s nothing worse than someone paying to see a movie based upon your recommendation, and then hating it. Well, actually, there’s plenty of things worse than that, but all the same…
While I agree that it does seem like an inadequate explanation, it’s actually a deliberate reference to a real case in 2000…
Environmental groups charge that the U.S. Armed Forces have routinely dumped toxic chemicals into South Korea for many years. In the beginning of July 2000, Green Korea United, a South Korea-based environmental group revealed photographs of the U.S. military illegally dumping concentrated formaldehyde into the Han River… (source)
So I suspect that particular plot point actually had a great deal of resonance with Seoulites, and the writer / director may have been willing for it to seem a bit weak to international viewers in exchange for a greater local impact.
February 16th, 2008 | 5:09pm
by Jim Bliss
Interesting… yes, that reference went straight over my head, and I’ll happily retract the accusation of slight cheapness.
February 16th, 2008 | 5:32pm
by Larry Teabag
Thanks… The single thing about the film that I was heartily dissapointed by was the opening. The rest was very good. Now you’ve given me that nugget, I feel much better about the whole film.
February 16th, 2008 | 7:55pm
by RA
I must confess, RA and Larry, that I’d heard about the events of 2000 before seeing the film (they were referred to in the review I read), so that opening scene brought a wry smile to my lips. I can see how it might be a bit flat if you didn’t know about it though (which obviously wouldn’t have been the case for the Korean audience).
February 20th, 2008 | 2:34am
by Jim Bliss