Official: people = consumers
It’s a busy night for coded government announcements. This time it’s the British Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, who has revealed much with her choice of language. We all know by now that late-capitalism has reduced us all, in theory, to mere consumers; units of potential economic exploitation. But when our own governments begin to see us, treat us, and overtly describe us in those terms then perhaps it’s time to man the barricades.
The story in this case is the rather predictable news that the British government is back-tracking on ID-cards (via Garry). This was inevitable, and I predicted as much the day I heard the project announced. The logistics of the proposed system meant that any due-diligence will have highlighted the near-impossibility of rendering it secure, or even of getting it to work properly. And the cost was always going to be prohibitive given the sheer pointlessness of the scheme. After all, if ID-cards were truly a necessary weapon in the fight against terrorism, any British Home Secretary who announced that “by 2015, 90% of foreign nationals will have identity cards” would be immediately fired from the position (and possibly charged with treason for leaving the nation dangerously unprotected. That’s surely aiding and abetting terrorism, even if only through rampant incompetence).
But of course, everyone knows the real reason for the scheme was to allow the government to build a central database containing detailed information on as many people as possible. Or “consumers” as they’re now known.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said students would also be encouraged to get identity cards from 2010, as part of plans to let “consumer demand” drive take-up.
BBC News | Rethink on identity cards plans
Firstly, I’m dubious about the notion that there’s any real “demand” for the things. Are British students really clamouring to be fingerprinted by the government? But it’s the phrase “consumer demand” that really caught my attention. Unless you are deliberately going out of your way to mangle the English language, there’s no way you could describe ID-cards as being “consumed” by those who are issued them. So the phrase “consumer demand” is being used in the sense of “being demanded by consumers”.
Perhaps I’m just being over-sensitive to the language of politicians these days, but it sounds sinister as hell to my ears, and gives a clear indication of the belief-system behind it.
It comes into clearer focus when you think what that phrase has replaced – public demand. We used to be the public…
As for the ‘demand’ part, I wouldn’t rule it out. I saw a talk the other day by John Curtice[1], who commented that it’s a myth that young people are cynical: all the polling evidence says that younger people, on average, are more likely to trust the government. Of course they are – they haven’t been around long enough to learn differently.
[1] Quite interesting, actually: Has that Internet Promoted (or Hindered) Involvement in Politics? Survey says: no, it hasn’t. I asked the ‘Dean campaign’ question – has Net-based political involvement had an adverse effect on the physical kind? – and he said there wasn’t any evidence for that either.
March 7th, 2008 | 8:06am
by Phil
Are British students really clamouring to be fingerprinted by the government?
they are when the government makes your grants and loans quick and easy to process if you’ve got a card and a bureaucratic nightmare if you haven’t.
My favourite bit of Smith’s response was on Channel 4 News. She’d said she wanted the cards to be ‘universal’. That would mean making everyone have one, even those who don’t wish to. The journo asked ‘in the interest of candour’ whether when she said ‘universal’ she was actually talking about ‘compulsion’.
Her reply began ‘I think the benefits of having cards are…’ and wandered off into a list of what cards might be nice for, and so wouldn’t it be good if they were universal.
March 8th, 2008 | 11:35am
by merrick
I reckon that if the government offered students a free ipod or £10 HMV voucher or something, tens of thousands of them would sign up to be fingerprinted and databased.
Makes you want to puke, don’t it.
March 24th, 2008 | 8:16pm
by pmm