Peak oil in Ireland
A few years ago in a longish piece about Nukes in Ireland, I discussed a report commissioned by the Irish Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment. Compiled by the advisory body, Forfás, I described it as “the Buzz Aldrin of peak oil studies” as it was the second major government study (in English) of the peak oil situation. The first such study was The Hirsch Report carried out by the US Department of Energy. Both came to very similar conclusions.
In the intervening four years the recommendations of the Forfás report have been roundly ignored by the government that commissioned it. Of course, governments commission a lot of studies and reports and can’t be expected to follow every recommendation in every one. But when presented with strong evidence from your top advisors that the entire country will go down the tubes unless something is done quickly, it takes either a criminally negligent or deeply moronic set of politicians to sweep that evidence under the carpet in the hope that ignoring it will help matters.
The report suggested that the crisis would start to seriously impact Ireland within ten to fifteen years. It suggested that radical measures needed to be taken immediately as it would take at least that long to prepare for peak oil and that even a ten year lead time was cutting it very fine indeed. The Hirsch Report, remember, suggested that twenty years was the bare minimum to implement a mitigation strategy that had any chance of working.
Sadly, the reality is, credible warnings were sounded and it is now simply too late to deal effectively with peak oil without significant damage being done to the fabric of global civilisation.
Which isn’t to say that nothing can be done. But each day we delay we make that damage all the worse. Each day we live in denial and insist that our strategy must be to achieve a “return to growth” rather than a wholesale restructuring of our economy, our systems of production and distribution, is a day closer to complete systemic collapse.
We are here already
For all intents and purposes we have already passed the global peak in oil production. We’ve reached the tipping point. Which is presumably why that title, Tipping Point, was chosen for yet another Irish report into the peak oil problem. Subtitled Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Production: An Outline Review, this time the study has been produced by Feasta (The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability) and it makes very grim reading indeed. If you don’t fancy downloading the full report, a brief summary can be accessed on their website. As I say though, it’s grim stuff.
The Irish Times today reports the study under the headline: Ireland ‘among most vulnerable’ to peak oil. The point I’d like to make — briefly as it’s getting late — is that although there’s a certain truth in that; it doesn’t tell the whole story.
Ireland’s vulnerability to peak oil stems from the fact that modern Ireland is more dependent upon cheap oil than most places. We are the third highest per capita oil consumers in Europe, thanks largely to our heavy use of oil to generate electricity (Dublin’s primary power station is an oil burner). We have squandered billions in recent years on road-building programmes while our public transport systems remain an embarrassment. The “knowledge economy” our government is so proud of building may have funded a decade-long orgy of consumerism but will ultimately turn out to be a betrayal of the people of Ireland. We allowed our traditional agricultural base to decline while hurtling towards a world where the ability to produce real actual food will be infinitely more valuable than being Google’s European base of operations.
And yet, despite the inevitable upheavals that approach us, Ireland does have a few things going for it. We’ve got a couple of aces up our sleeves. Albeit no thanks to the people who actually run the country.
Firstly is the fact that we are one of the few countries in the developed world that has not exceeded its notional carrying capacity. In other words, should there be a collapse in global trade — as predicted by the Feasta study — Ireland could become self-sufficient in food production. Certainly it would take a huge effort to achieve this, and given the kind of people we’ve tended to put in charge of national policy there’s every chance we’ll screw it up completely. Nonetheless, this island has the ability to produce enough food to prevent widespread hunger. The same cannot be said for many of our neighbours.
Another advantage we possess is our broadly socialist culture. Yes, it’s taken a severe knock in the past twenty years as successive governments sought to emulate the neoliberal travesties that rose briefly to international prominence on the back of an over-abundance of cheap energy. Nonetheless, I genuinely feel that the basic vision of de Valera (the most influential political figure in the early years of the Irish state) is still there. Sure, it’s buried beneath a thick layer of dust. And yes, it was always uncomfortably bound up with the darkness of Irish Catholicism. But de Valera’s basic vision of a socialist-leaning nation built upon agricultural self-sufficiency and a firm rejection of the entrenched power of private capital hasn’t been dead so long that it can’t be revived.
Here on this small wet island we possess the raw materials to keep body and soul together. And terrible though it may be to point it out, this actually puts us in a minority of nations. Whether we actually do keep body and soul together though, remains very much in the balance. But our national culture — the collective psyche of Ireland — shouldn’t be as unreceptive to the steps required to achieve this as might be the case elsewhere.
See, a transition to sustainability will happen. There’s not actually a choice in this. We can no more choose another option than we can legislate gravity away. The only question is how much destruciton and suffering will be involved in that transition. And that will largely be predicated upon how quickly we wake up to the need to act. The more preparation we carry out before the oil supply starts to significantly dwindle, the less damage we’ll suffer as a nation — and as a global civilisation.
“We are the third highest per capita oil consumers in Europe, thanks largely to our heavy use of oil to generate electricity ”
Thanks for explaining that one – the Times report completely failed to actually explain how Ireland managed to be more oil-intensive than the rest of Europe despite having more or less the same lifestyle.
I’m mildly pleased to find myself in a country that’s food-self-sufficient and energy-self-sufficient – although given that most of the energy here isn’t in the form of oil, the eejits in charge still need shot for failing to invest in electric suburban and high-speed-rail…
April 8th, 2010 | 2:03am
by john b
There’s a handful of places, John, that possess the basic raw materials (in the broadest sense) to weather peak oil without descent into total chaos. Of the English-speaking places — because speaking the local lingo during such a crisis will be advantageous — I’d suggest New Zealand is top of the list. If Australia can sort out the fresh water issue, though, then it’s in a decent enough position (I’d be looking into largescale solar-desalination if I was an Aussie policy-maker).
The fact that Ireland’s disproportionate oil consumption can be attributed to electricity generation is actually a good thing, seeing as how we have an abundance of ocean and wind potential to replace it with.
Sadly we’re not converting that potential into actual at anywhere close to the necessary rate.
April 8th, 2010 | 2:16am
by Jim Bliss
The water is only a problem in Australia because the population has outgrown the supply/storage infrastructure. But peak oil could fix that. You see, when we decend into chaos, first to go will be the old, frail, sick, etc. Anybody that cant survive without artificial means like medicines or special diets etc……..they all die. Next go all the people who are just plain useless and can’t really do anything except their office job…….which they won’t have anymore. When you get down to it, the survivers will be the people that are 1. fit and healthy, with a good constitution. 2 mentally and physically tough. 3. have a range of knowledge and skills in real things, fishing, hunting, growing food, making things by hand etc. 4. belong to a family or group of people the same. Lets face it, if I’m in a group of people that are all of the above, and some loser comes along that can’t offer anything and is just going to be a burden on us, then he’s better off as fertilizer for the garden bed then a useless dead weight consuming our food and water.
Population will reduce in every area to the carrying capacity of that area……and it will be the most fit in the new environment that will survive. In the end……all the losers and weaklings and people that think that world owes them and they are entitled to this and entitled to that are going to perish……and good ridence.
Bring on the Peak…….no………I mean…….bring on the decline……….make that the cliff.
April 8th, 2010 | 1:37pm
by Stu
You may well be right, Stu. But that doesn’t mean I don’t despise your attitude. Most of the people you arrogantly dismiss as “losers” had no choice but to be born and raised in an unsustainable society. Blaming any animal for successfully adapting to its home environment is beyond idiotic. If you’re looking forward to a world where compassion and empathy are looked down upon as weaknesses, then frankly you’re welcome to it. Just remember, there’ll always be someone out there whose even more cruel, ruthless, well-armed and unpleasant than you.
What’s more, unlike you they may even be more than semi-literate.
April 8th, 2010 | 2:07pm
by Jim Bliss
jim your reply to stu was well put. I think instead turning our backs on the weak the young, the old and those that do not possess the tools to survive we need to educate to prepare them for peak oil. Food will be our biggest problem and each village will have to produce their own supply. One way to help produce food might be to develop large community gardens that are funded by each household. If each village installs 15 large wind mills as a energy source to pump heat, water and produce light to large buildings much of our food requirement can be met this way. There are new hydroponics systems available now that can produce three thousand head of lettuce in a space of 1500 sq feet and can produce in less than a third of the time compare to inground growing. It can be viewed at mega gardens. Villages would soon over produce and trade for other products that it will need or indeed we might trade electic power into the grid that can can be exchanged for electricity true value in the form of goods and services were all people process a credit card to receive electric credits or debit. This is what we must do educate from a early age produing energy local, wind river and ocean and share it from the bottom up instead of from the top down.
December 28th, 2010 | 1:38pm
by conal Breslin
Sorry the web site to view the new hydroponic system is omegagarden.com
December 30th, 2010 | 9:47pm
by conal Breslin